Who Leads the NDR?

The question behind the contest

There is a question increasingly placed before South Africa, sometimes openly and sometimes through the language of political contestation: who leads the National Democratic Revolution?

It is not a question that can be settled by whoever uses the most uncompromising language about revolution, socialism or working-class politics. Nor is it a matter of political branding. It is a question of history, political responsibility, organisation, democratic legitimacy and the capacity to translate a national project into a lived reality.

The National Democratic Revolution belongs, in the first instance, to the people of South Africa. Its strategic objective is the creation of a united, non-racial, non-sexist and democratic society, overcoming the structures and consequences of colonialism and apartheid and progressively changing the distribution of social and economic power.

Yet the question of political leadership remains legitimate. The ANC has historically assumed that responsibility, developed the NDR as a strategic conception and organised millions of South Africans around its realisation. That position is not sustained by assertion alone. It rests on a record of struggle, organisation, democratic participation and the exercise of political power.

In 2026, with local government elections approaching and the political terrain changing, that record deserves to be understood with confidence, honesty and historical perspective.

The NDR was never simply an electoral programme

The National Democratic Revolution did not begin with the establishment of a democratic government in 1994. Its roots reach into the long struggle against colonial conquest, racial dispossession and apartheid, carried by generations who understood that political freedom had to be connected to a better material life.

The Freedom Charter gave that aspiration a powerful democratic expression. Its vision connected political rights with land, work, education, social security, economic opportunity and the principle that the people shall govern.

The ANC subsequently developed the NDR as a strategic conception of social transformation. Its Strategy and Tactics has consistently located the project in the building of a united, non-racial, non-sexist and democratic society, while linking political democracy to socioeconomic transformation.

This is why leadership of the NDR cannot be reduced to who can claim its vocabulary most convincingly. It is demonstrated through organisation, political education, mass mobilisation, democratic participation, strategic clarity and the ability to convert political objectives into programmes that improve people's lives.

The ANC has never claimed that it liberated South Africa alone. The defeat of apartheid was the product of the struggle of millions and the contribution of political, worker, civic, student, women's, youth, religious and community formations. The SACP and the trade union movement occupy an important place in that history, as does the wider Mass Democratic Movement.

But the liberation movement was not without political leadership. The ANC became the principal national political expression of the liberation struggle because it could organise across communities and social forces and give them a common political home.

That capacity remains central to the ANC's conception of its role. It is the basis of its political hegemony within the national democratic struggle: the capacity to unite diverse motive forces around a common national programme while accepting political responsibility for its implementation.

The record of democratic transformation matters

South Africa after 1994 was not a blank page. The democratic state inherited a society deliberately constructed around racial exclusion, unequal citizenship, spatial segregation and concentrated economic power. The majority had been denied political rights and systematically excluded from equal access to education, housing, healthcare, infrastructure and economic opportunity.

The democratic state began dismantling that order.

The scale of transformation is visible in the expansion of access to basic services, social protection, education, housing, healthcare and democratic rights. Census 2022 records a substantial increase in households and a major expansion in access to services compared with the early democratic period.

Behind every one of these statistics is a household. It is a family that moved from an informal settlement into a formal home. It is a child who entered a school that did not exist for previous generations. It is a community connected to electricity or a reliable water network. It is an older person whose social grant provides a measure of security. It is a young South African whose right to participate in democratic life is no longer determined by race.

These are not abstract achievements. They are part of the lived history of democratic South Africa, and they are part of the record of the ANC in government.

The ANC should speak about these gains with confidence. A liberation movement does not dishonour its history by recognising what democratic government has changed. It honours that history by ensuring that democratic power continues to improve the lives of the people.

The task is therefore not to deny the transformation that has taken place. It is to deepen it, make it more tangible and ensure that economic power, opportunity and productive capacity are progressively brought closer to the people.

The unfinished economic question is especially a youth question

The most immediate expression of the unfinished economic work of the NDR is found in the lives of young South Africans.

A young person completing school, university, college or skills training does not experience the economy as a policy document. They experience it as the difference between receiving an opportunity and waiting indefinitely for one. They experience it in the difficulty of finding work, starting a business, accessing finance, entering productive sectors or building an independent life.

This is why youth unemployment cannot be treated as a peripheral issue. It goes to the heart of the NDR's promise of a better life.

The ANC Youth League has correctly kept this question on the political agenda. Its President, Comrade Collen Malatji, has called on President Cyril Ramaphosa to declare unemployment a national disaster so that the state can mobilise the necessary resources and coordinate a far more concentrated response. The call deserves serious political attention.

There is a clear connection between that demand and the ANC's own 2026 programme. The movement has declared 2026 the Year of Decisive Action to Fix Local Government and Transform the Economy. The meaning of decisive action must be visible in the economic lives of young people.

War rooms and coordination mechanisms have a place in government. But the scale of youth unemployment requires more than administrative coordination. It requires the requisite resources, stronger implementation and a determined economic programme capable of expanding productive activity and employment.

That means accelerating economic transformation, industrialisation, infrastructure investment, township and rural economies, support for small enterprises, skills development and sectors capable of absorbing large numbers of young people. It also means connecting education and training to the productive needs of the economy.

When a generation is educated but cannot find a place in the economy, the question is not merely whether government has a programme. The question is whether the political economy is being transformed fast enough to give that generation a stake in the country's future.

For the ANC, this is not an argument for abandoning the NDR. It is an argument for making its economic content more immediate, more measurable and more visible in the lives of the people.

Leadership is a question of political capacity

The ANC's historic role is inseparable from its organisational character. It developed as a national movement capable of bringing together different classes and social strata that objectively stood to gain from democratic transformation.

That remains one of its defining political strengths.

The ANC is not built around a single social constituency. It has historically organised workers, rural communities, professionals, intellectuals, businesspeople, young people, women, community activists and many other social forces within a common national project. That does not mean interests within society are identical. It means the ANC has sought to provide a political framework through which those interests can be negotiated within the larger strategic objective of national democratic transformation.

This is also why the ANC's relationship with the Alliance cannot be reduced to a contest between organisations over political ownership. The ANC, SACP and COSATU have distinct histories, constituencies and organisational responsibilities. Their common history is one of cooperation, disagreement, debate and collective struggle.

The SACP's decision to contest the 2026 local government elections independently is therefore an important development. The Party has explained its decision in terms of strengthening working-class representation and advancing a socialist alternative. That political position is entitled to be debated on its merits.

For the ANC, the appropriate response is neither defensiveness nor dismissal. It is to continue demonstrating, through organisation and political practice, why it remains the principal vehicle through which diverse social forces can be organised around the NDR.

The strength of the ANC has never depended on ideological uniformity. It has depended on its ability to create political unity among people whose immediate interests and social experiences are not always the same. That capacity for political articulation and national organisation is central to the movement's historical hegemony.

The GNU changes the terrain, not the historic objective

The 2024 national election changed the political terrain. The ANC no longer holds a national majority and now governs within a Government of National Unity.

This is a new balance of political forces, not an abandonment of the NDR.

Coalition politics requires negotiation, discipline and political clarity. It also requires the ANC to use its position in government to defend democratic gains, improve the functioning of the state and advance the interests of the people.

The important question is therefore not whether the ANC can govern under different political circumstances. It is whether it can use the present circumstances to deepen its organisational work, strengthen local government and pursue economic transformation with greater determination.

That is consistent with the ANC's 2026 programme. The movement has placed fixing local government, accelerating economic transformation, creating jobs, deepening social justice and renewing the movement among the central tasks of the year.

The 2026 local government elections will consequently be more than an electoral event. They will be an opportunity for South Africans to assess which political formations can translate political commitments into functioning municipalities, economic opportunity and a better daily life.

Renewal is about strengthening the movement's capacity to serve

Every liberation movement must remain capable of listening to the people whose aspirations gave it historical purpose. The ANC's renewal is therefore not a repudiation of its history. It is a means of strengthening its capacity to carry that history into the present.

Where organisational weaknesses have emerged, they must be addressed through political education, cadre development, disciplined branches, accountable leadership and a closer relationship with communities. Where conduct inconsistent with the values of the movement has affected public confidence, the answer is consequence, correction and organisational renewal.

The ANC has demonstrated that it can confront shortcomings while remaining confident about its historic mission. Its 2026 programme places decisive action, improved local government, economic transformation and renewal at the centre of its work.

South Africans do not need a movement that merely explains why their problems exist. They need a movement capable of organising society and the state to solve them.

The ANC therefore has every reason to be ambitious about the next phase of the NDR. The task is to make democratic power increasingly meaningful in the everyday lives of people, especially the poor, the working class, women, rural communities and young people.

The political question before the ANC

The question of who leads the NDR ultimately returns us to the nature of leadership itself.

Leadership is not ownership. It is responsibility.

It is the responsibility to organise. To persuade. To educate. To mobilise. To govern. To build institutions. To defend democratic gains. To transform the economy. To place the interests of the people above the convenience of the moment.

By that measure, the ANC's claim to leadership is rooted in more than history. It rests on its role as the principal national political organisation of the liberation movement, its constitutional and strategic commitment to the NDR, its experience of exercising state power and its continuing ability to bring diverse social forces into a common political project.

But history is not a substitute for political work. The authority inherited from generations of struggle must continually be translated into relevance for the present generation.

That is why the young South African searching for work, the family seeking a functioning municipality, the township entrepreneur looking for opportunity and the rural community demanding infrastructure are not separate from the NDR. They are where its meaning is tested.

The ANC must therefore meet the next phase with confidence, seriousness and a clear sense of purpose. It must use its organisational reach, political experience and strategic position to give direction to the aspirations of the people and to turn the promise of democratic freedom into deeper social and economic transformation.

The question before South Africa is not who owns the NDR.

The question is who is prepared and equipped to lead its next phase.

For the ANC, the answer must be demonstrated not only in political argument, but in the daily work of organising, governing, transforming and serving.

That is the responsibility of the ANC. And that work continues.

Related reading

• Opinion: We Must Prepare Ourselves for the Day the ANC Is Completely Out of Power in Our Lifetime
• Opinion: On Dr Zamani Saul’s Selective Amnesia and Denialism: The Writing Is on the Wall — SACP Will Contest 2026 LGE Wall to Wall!